Superman

dragon-of-sapphire:

chaoschronicler:

crazy-pages:

firebirdeternal:

crazy-pages:

I just realized that Clark Kent probably works at the Daily Planet because it means he and his super-senses are planted right in the middle of a bunch of investigative journalists all day long. He probably knows more about Metropolis’ corruption and abuses of power than anyone else in the world, just by virtue of existing in the Daily Planet’s vicinity. 

I imagine also that he works there for the reverse reason.
Think about all the things he knows about the people in positions of power in the city that Really Should be made known to the public, but he can’t figure out a way to legitimately excuse having that knowledge?
Well, all he has to do is drop a hint of a thread in the lap of someone like Lois Lane and his coworkers and friends will be on it like bloodhounds, with a firm air of legitimacy that he himself would never, ever have. Because honestly? Clark Kent probably knows that “I heard about it with my magic alien hearing” isn’t and SHOULDN’T be admissible in a court of law or public opinion. But aiming some good old fashioned investigative journalists in the most competitive news organisation in the city at it? Perfectly legitimate.

Villain: “Hah! What are you going to do, punch me for tax evasion? Lock me up for conspiracy? With what court-admissible evidence? Admit it Superman, there’s nothing you can do here.”

Superman: “Guess not.” 

Later, Clark Kent at the Daily Planet watching his colleagues work: “My god, they’re like bureaucratic piranhas. They went through his entire IRS filings for the last eight quarters in thirty minutes flat.” 

You know this got me thinking, what is Clark’s news articles like? Did he ever win a Pulitzer Prize like Lois? Is he a good writer?

Clark is an editor, he’s Lois’s editor. He’s the best editor because no one can proof read and spell check as fast as him. The few times he’s gone out on a story is because the Daily Planet was spread thin or short staffed.

stagdoewolfdog:

vondrakenhof:

prongsmydeer:

I hope Sirius constantly turned into a dog to get out of arguments with James, because it would mean that James was left with the following options:

  • Being known as the crazy man who is arguing with a dog
  • Rough-housing, and being known as the man who is mean to dogs
  • Submitting to Sirius’s literal puppy-dog eyes, and losing almost every argument they have from the age of 15 onward

The fourth option is to turn into a deer and continue the argument.

Hogwarts student: *walks in on a deer and dog barking at each other*

Hogwarts student: 

Hogwarts student: why does this keep happening

shobogan:

iconuk01:

tredlocity:

Clark Kent is not a coward, he just hates Superman. The reason he runs off every time disaster occurs is cause he knows Superman will be there soon and he can’t stand the guy.

Oh lord, the idea of a running gag of Clark having to come up with more and more elaborate reasons to hate the most beloved guy on Earth would be comedy gold.

“I loaned him thirty four bucks three weeks ago and he STILL hasn’t paid me back”

“I saw him littering once”

“He’s friends with an asshole like Batman!”

“We’re not friends anymore AND HE KNOWS WHY!”

“HE KEEPS HITTING ON MY WIFE”

the-new-guy23:

lbibliophile:

Death comes for Minerva McGonagall.

It comes for her, as it came for her husband, so many years ago.
It comes for her, as it came for her Headmaster, the price of his ambition.
It comes for her, as it came for far too many of her friends and students, in one war then another.

Death comes for her.

Minerva McGonagall Looks at Death, and raises an eyebrow.

Death pauses, then nods and backs away.
“We’ll call this number three then, shall we?”

She smiles as she turns back to her paperwork.
There is a reason her animagus form is a cat.

You know, this is interesting. It actually ties in really well with this theory I have: the three major professors in Harry’s life are representative of the three brothers.

Dumbledore is the first brother, albeit with slightly more forethought and self-awareness. He has the Elder Wand, he has a strong sense of self-importance and hubris, and his actions (however noble they may have ultimately been) catch up with him in the end.

Snape is the second brother; fixated on the past, particularly a lost love. He’s obsessed with holding onto whatever piece of Lily that he possible can (remember, kids: if Harry hadn’t had Lily’s eyes, Snape wouldn’t have cared about him at all and he would have let Harry die when he was 11 years old and Quirrell was trying to kill him during the Quidditch match!). It’s this obsession that ultimately leads him to his demise. Because, let’s be clear, Severus Snape knew that Voldemort was going to kill him one way or another. Everything he did, he did in spite of that. Does that make his actions heroic? No, his motivations preclude that. But that’s something else entirely, I could write a whole Essay on the complexities of Snape. Let’s get back to the theory.

McGonagall is the third brother; constantly evading death, riddled with humility. And OP is right: there’s a reason her animagus is a cat. She’s constantly evading Death, but not by being nimble and clever. She leads her life in relative peace, when you look at it. She never tried to make herself into a power player in the war against Voldemort. She never used her magic to bolster her own importance. She stood and fought when it was called for, but she never sought out the glory of being a key figure in the grand scheme of things. Instead, she is the only one of these professors who actually focused her energy on teaching. Minerva McGonagall was dedicated to living her life in a more straight-forward manner than the other two. It’s because of this that Death never comes for her over the course of the seven books. She never goes out of her way to put herself in its path and, instead, fights Voldemort in a way that nobody else even thought to do: by imparting knowledge.

The Tale of the Three Brothers was the very foundation of these books. It was there from the beginning.

Also McGonagall is the absolute best out of all the Big Three professors.

lytefoot:

So the Weasleys are the rare pureblood family that actually keeps some sort of track of their squibs, right?

Like, 11-year-old Ron knows he has a cousin who’s an accountant, even though he’s aware that it’s vaguely shameful.

So please consider: one of the businesses Fred and George ran out of their back room, in the early days after the Ministry fell, was creating fake family trees for Muggle-Borns.

Weasleys are already known to have enormous families, what’s one or two extra a generation or two back?

(Aunt Muriel is awful, but in the face of Muggleborn Registration, absolutely she’ll admit to having a couple of squib children she doesn’t mention in polite company, because who would, but she’s delighted to learn that magic resurfaced in their grandchildren, why are the men from the Ministry frowning when they deliver such wonderful news, and they can d**n well keep their boots off the carpet. A couple of Muggleborns the Twins kept out of trouble that way sent Aunt Muriel half-joking mothers’ day cards until the day she died.)

bjornwilde:

jenniferrpovey:

Triggered by another post I didn’t want to hijack:

Excalibur.

In the legends, Excalibur comes out of a lake (although some versions have Excalibur as the sword in the stone, those are later…the sword Arthur pulls from the stone breaks and he goes to get a better one).

From the “Lady of the Lake.”

Here’s the thing.

In northern Europe in the Iron Age all the way through to the early Medieval period, most iron came from bog iron. It was hard to smelt, because it was a rather low grade ore, but you didn’t have to mine it and it was a renewable resource (in about twenty years you could just come back and get more, because it formed constantly).

Meaning that the iron used to make a sword came…out of water.

In most fairy stories, fairies don’t like iron. So the vision of the Lady as some kind of fairy or elf? Not likely.

The idea of her as a druid? Maybe.

But what’s far more likely is this: The Lady of the Lake was a smith.

But….but…

The Celtic deity in charge of smiths and ironworking was Bridget, a goddess. The mystical associations with the Lady would fit with her being a priestess of Bridget…and thus, a smith.

IOW, Arthurian people, maybe we should not be visualizing the Lady of the Lake  as a slender, graceful woman in a gown…

…but as a jacked smith in an apron.

Yes PLEASE!

thor-20:

smarmyanarchist:

stuckuptumblercunt:

smarmyanarchist:

smarmyanarchist:

god im just thinking about how much going to public school in the MCU would’ve made me hate captain america. every time i got caught giving some bitch the finger or writing on bathroom walls or ditching class or stealing books from the library cause i got a fine or what have you, and then they gave me lunch detention or ISS and i sat in that dumbass eraser-smelling room and im in My Chair (the chair i always sit in and yell at anyone else who tries to take it), fuming, arms crossed, full of teen angst and hating everyone around me, and AGAIN had to watch this stupid fucking video ive already seen so many times that i know it by heart and every word grates on my eardrums and i’d just see this fuckin familiar face

and i would be ready to LOSE MY SHIT

Villain Origin Story

god imagine Steve giving Peter his Captain America is Disappointed in You face/lecture over something dumb and Peter just fucking dissociating and zoning back in to “Peter! Are you even listening to me???” and looking him in the eye and being like “I’m completely immune at this point. You can’t even touch me.” and walking the fuck away

canon.

the real reason why Peter agreed to fight cap at the airport