thebibliosphere:

thehalfdrunkwerewolf:

prismatic-bell:

typical-atheist-scumbag:

coolmanfromthepast:

thefreakhasgreeneyes:

phoenixonwheels:

phoenixonwheels:

Just for once I’d like to tell the gate agents and flight attendants that my folding wheelchair is going into the onboard closet and not have them tell me there’s “no room”. Bitch that’s a wheelchair closet, not a “your bags” closet. Move your damn bags where they belong.

Ok, so according to my friendly aviation expert, this is a Big Fucking Deal. In fact, if an airline argues with you about putting your wheelchair in the wheelchair closet or even suggests there may not be room, unless there is already another passenger’s wheelchair in that closet, they have violated federal law.

CFR Title 14, Chapter II, Subchapter D, Part 382, Subpart E, Section 382.67, Subsection (e)

“As a carrier, you must never request or suggest that a passenger not stow his or her wheelchair in the cabin to accommodate other passengers (e.g., informing a passenger that stowing his or her wheelchair in the cabin will require other passengers to be removed from the flight), or for any other non-safety related reason (e.g., that it is easier for the carrier if the wheelchair is stowed in the cargo compartment).”

Source

This is hugely important because it means that if this happens to you, you should report their asses to the DOT. Why? Because these statistics are published every year for every airline, and the airline gets a huge ass fine for every violation. If we want to see change, we need to make airlines literally pay every time they treat us this way.

@annieelainey you should share this with your followers! This is important info!!

To my mutuals on wheels, print out the law before you fly and whip it out at the gate if they don’t accomodate your wheels.

Thanks a lot for posting this, bro! Flying while crippled is already difficult enough without people pulling this kind of shit. Also, make sure that if there is a piece of your wheelchair or something important missing off of it, that you make a big fucking deal out of it! I’ve had pieces fall off of my wheelchair and nearly lost a decoration I had on it that meant a lot to me because people were careless with my chair. Don’t let them mistreat your wheelchair.

Non-wheelchair folks:

Now that you know, speak up.

You never know when you’re going to see someone who needs an ally.

@thebibliosphere can you reblog this?

I was actually looking for this post the other day for someone who was worried about flying with their chair. I can’t remember your username, but here! this is the thing I was talking about!

christel-thoughts:

bonitapplebumb:

shayera-hol:

hervacationh0me:

smartsauce:

Look at his hands, look at her balance. She’s not daintily placing her foot in the air, she is off-kilter. The placement of his legs and the force he is exerting on her is pulling her off of her feet. Look at his hand on her waist. He’s forcing her hips into that position. Look at her head in the crook of his elbow, he has entire control over the position of her head. Look at the way they kiss, look at his closed fist. This wasn’t a gentle advance with an opportunity for dissent (or consent), this was a woman ripped off of her feet and molested. This is rape culture. 

Man, shut the fuck up.

LOLOLOLOL

LMFAOOOOOOOOO!!!!

except that’s exactly what it is. she didn’t know him. Her name’s Greta Zimmer. The NY Post interviewed her this. year. “She isn’t sure how long she was standing there; maybe minutes. “And then I was grabbed,” she says. “That man was very strong. I wasn’t kissing him. He was kissing me.” Just as suddenly, he let her go. George stumbled off towards the subway, Rita [his girlfriend] trailing behind, and Greta walked back to her office. George and Rita never discussed the kiss, nor did Greta tell anyone what had happened to her.

Her husband, now deceased, noticed something else: The odd angle of the woman’s left thumb. According to Verria [co-author of The Kissing Sailor], Greta’s husband said, “You know, when you get very tense, your arm stiffens up and your thumb sticks out just like that.” ”

Iconic Sailor Smooth Actually A Drunken Sailor Accosting Some Woman Who Doesn’t Know Him

dappermouth:

For weeks now, I’ve been hearing my neighbors from across the ravine hollering to their young daughter, Natalie. I’ve never seen these people, but the sound carries pretty clearly.

“Nat, get out from under the car, it’s time to go.” “Natalieee! Don’t go peepee in the road sweetie!“  “Oh my god, Josh–get Natalie! She’s running after a deer.”

I’ve been over here like “Holy crap, this kid is wild…bold…fabulous…”

I finally went over to the other side of the ravine today, and in doing so I discovered that Natalie is, in fact, a beagle. I’m crushed.

diversehighfantasy:

fandomsandfeminism:

Here’s the thing about Standardized Testing. 

I became a teacher, partly, because I didn’t want a job where my goal was to make money. I didn’t want to create profit. I want to create thinkers and voters and citizens. 

Standardized Testing is part of a push by conservative government to make public education profitable for private corporations. 

My state pays Pearson $90 Million EVERY YEAR just for STAAR testing. That doesn’t include Pearson test prep materials, or any of the other tests they run.Pearson writes G/T tests, AP tests, even teacher certification tests. 

The market is basically a monopoly  And Standardized Testing is now a multi-billion dollar industry.

And for what?  They don’t measure educational quality. They haven’t improved student performance. All they really seem to measure is family income, which is the best predictor for student performance. 

I didn’t go into this job to create profit, but those in power found a way to profit off our work anyway. 

They’re also the primary tool for modern redlining.

angryfishtrap:

argumate:

bubobubosibericus:

catleidh:

lierdumoa:

What we all need to understand about AI in a nutshell:

There’s an algorithm that can reliably predict, from aggregate facebook posts, the onset of a manic episode in a person suffering from bipolar disorder – more reliably even, than a trained psychotherapist, who only has access to the information a patient provides them in therapy sessions. 

“Won’t technology like that help people with bipolar disorder?”

Theoretically, it could. But this algorithm wasn’t designed to help people with bipolar disorder.

This algorithm was designed to sell plane tickets to Las Vegas.

[source]

Guys you gotta click the link. Because this was not just an accidental outcome- it’s click bait based on algorithms.

the AI knows you’re about to hit mania so it pushes Las Vegas Airfare Adverts to you so when you hit the mania you buy one, because it’s figured out that bipolar people that have hit mania are more likely to start gambling/making impulsive decisions – and that will sell a ticket. 

They didn’t explicitly mean to target bipolar people who have hit mania, but the algorithm is really good at learning shit and the more things you like or sites you visit the more accurate it’s recommendations are, so it basically started pushing ads at people with bipolar disorder and nobody knows what exactly it’s picking up on.

Seriously click the source link it’s a TED Talk about 23 minutes long.

@argumate relevant.

arguably as with most AI risk it’s just the intensification of an existing trend, in this case “advertising takes advantage of people for profit”

No, seriously. If you spend any time on the internet, you need to watch this and be aware of what’s going on behind the browsers. This is not some conspiracy theory. This shit is real, it’s happening right now, and there are major ripple effects through all our online experiences, whether you know it or not. 

christel-thoughts:

auntiewanda:

cumbler-tumbler:

auntiewanda:

thesovereignempress:

You know acting like this is representative of the general hurdles that everyday women have facing sexual harassment is really fucking stupid.

Except, you know, women keep getting violently assaulted or murdered for saying “no” to men: 

https://mic.com/articles/135394/14-women-were-brutally-attacked-for-rejecting-men-why-arent-we-talking-about-it#.37nChXzzP

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4874492/Woman-27-seven-guests-shot-ex-husband.html

http://people.com/crime/florida-woman-and-sister-killed-by-her-ex-husband-murder-suicide/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/man-strangles-kills-teenager-woman-murder-reject-marriage-proposal-pennsylvania-illinois-a8043741.html

https://nypost.com/2016/09/06/student-killed-at-jouvert-wanted-man-to-stop-grinding-on-her-cops/

So yeah. Women have this in the back of their minds when sexually harassed or approached by a creep. That any man who they reject could turn violent and kill them. So maybe its time to have a conversation about misogyny and the entitlement men have toward women. 

How anyone can look at an incident of sexual harassment in school culminating in violent retribution and not see an everyday danger in something that literally happens every day is just mind-blowing.

Because we can’t admit women have legitimate reasons to be wary of men because that’s mean and hurts men’s feelings.

there’s a thread or two on twitter of women being killed for rejecting men… when the woman first said she would start it, men called her all kinds of a liar. and then as she added to it every day, they started the name-calling, threats, etc.

i say all this to say i do not believe for one second that men don’t know this is a real problem. they just don’t want us discussing it and compiling the information.

it’s just like how the NRA keeps pushing the “lone wolf” and “isolated incident” narrative. it’s just like how the cops keep pushing “isolated incident”. They know it’s a lie.

dear white male writers: DO NOT DO THIS

debooga:

naamahdarling:

elfwreck:

elodieunderglass:

a-modern-major-general:

elennare:

elinor-cross-productions:

i-gwarth:

thelittleblackfox:

write-like-an-american:

rookerstash-after-dark:

123-its-just-me:

typhoidmeri:

dizzy-redhead:

geekandmisandry:

someoneintheshadow446:

catsfeminismandatla:

geekandmisandry:

laughlikesomethingbroken:

thatgirlonstage:

laughlikesomethingbroken:

laughlikesomethingbroken:

wearevengeancenow:

the-thorster:

fozmeadows:

These horrific, sexist, racist paragraphs – screenshotted and shared for posterity by James Smythe, to whom we are all indebted – are the work of one Liam O’Flynn, a writer and English teacher. Evidently, they come from his book Writing With Stardust: the Ultimate Descriptive Guide for students, parents, teachers, and lovers of English, and are intended as examples of good writing.

UM.

Dear white male writers: DO NOT DO THIS SHIT. IT IS SUPER GROSS AND FETISHISTIC AND ALSO TERRIBLE WRITING. THIS IS WHY WE CAN’T HAVE NICE THINGS. 

Like I just. “Her virility-brown eyes -” WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN? How can you have an “Amazonian figure” ON a “wafer-thin body” when “figure” is a word that describe’s a body’s shape, and Amazonian means pretty much the DIRECT FUCKING OPPOSITE of “wafer-thin” in the first place? 

What the shitting fuck does ANY of this mean, apart from “I am only nebulously familiar with the concept of women and completely at a loss if I can’t compare their various bodyparts to jewels, animals and footstuffs”?

STOP 

GO TO WRITING JAIL

GO DIRECTLY TO WRITING JAIL, DO NOT PASS GO, DO NOT COLLECT $200

tag yourself i’m the two beryl-green jewels in the snow

if her ears frame her nose do they like, grow directly beside her nose? how does she see from them? 

*facepalm*

Writing With Stardust: the Ultimate Descriptive Guide for students, parents, teachers, and lovers of English

lovers of english

oh my goddddddd

i can’t get over this fucking post

“I loved her nebulous, eden-green eyes which were a-sparkle with the ‘joie de vivre’. They were like two beryl-green jewels melted onto snow.”

1. what the fuck is joie de vivre

2. melted jewels?

3. beryl green

eden green:

WHICH ONE IS ITTTTTTTTT

@laughlikesomethingbroken “Joie de vivre” is a French phrase that literally translates to “joy of living”, while it IS one of those phrases that gets used in English in this context it is SO EXTRA AND UNNECESSARY OH MY GOD. Don’t use French to make yourself sound sophisticated when you’re NOT

I don’t know where to even START. Curvilinear waist? Sugar candy-sweet? What the FUCK are seraph’s ears? Voguish clothes? What the everloving fuck is “constellation blue” supposed to mean??? Like forget the objectification, this writing is horrifying enough before we even get to the embedded sexism

seraph’s ears are ears that you can’t see bc they’re hidden behind her 6 wings

Oyster white teeth?

holy purple prose batman

Female writers do this too. Have you read a Mills and Boon novel? Have you read high school girls’ yaoi fanfics?

Uh oh, we were focusing too much on how a grown man is selling this shit and not enough shitting on teenage girls. Egalitarians here to put an end to that shit.

Guess what? I’ve read A LOT of Harlequin novels and a LOT of fanfic and I have never ever seen anything this horrible at description.

Also, none of those stories were trying to hold themselves up as high examples of the craft

You guys here is the description of the book on Amazon.

If this is the description I cannot think how bad the inside is.

I never ever want to hear anyone make fun of fanfic writers again

NEVER EVER

Lord god almighty. I’ve been feeling really down about my writing lately, but this is a confidence boost. 8I

“single but in a long term relationship”

3.6/5 is entirely too high a Goodreads score for this book

… that second one is describing a dog.

As well as the sexism, racism, purple prose, and general nonsense… “The moons delicate light”? At least learn to use apostrophes correctly before setting yourself up as a writing expert, good lord.

“You will find that this book will transform the way you think about descriptive writing.”

Well it sure did that…

Gosh

I really want to know what a “decanter shaped waist” is. Which one of these matches her waistline? The most common version is “upper part is lightly flared at the top, and then it swells out to triple the upper width.” So… measurements like 34-26-56? On her wafer-thin Amazonian body?

Definitely #4, but it’s a totally unrealistic standard for women.

Uh… Nougat isn’t brown… If it is, it better be fucking chocolate mate or you’ve really fucked it up.

frettedwithgoldenfire:

frettedwithgoldenfire:

SCOTUS just ruled, 5-4, in an opinion written by Neil Gorsuch, that workers no longer have the right to collectively sue their employers .Rather than being able to respond to the oppression of large employers as a collective voice (think class action lawsuits), employees will now need to arbitrate with employers “1-on’1,″ which really means “1-vs.-a giant corporation’ and will greatly diminish the ability of employees, particularly those of limited means, to seek recourse for mistreatment by their employers. This is probably the biggest blow to labor in the US this century, and represents another oligarchical push against the ability of the working classes to hold employers accountable. 

Employers getting to unilaterally decide the terms of their contracts with employees has never gone wrong before.